However, the practical impact of the direction has raised concerns among education stakeholders. New allied healthcare programmes can proceed only in areas where an NCAHP-approved curriculum is available. As a result, professions recognised under the NCAHP framework but awaiting curriculum approval may face restrictions on launching new academic programmes.
The issue gains importance as India continues to expand its allied healthcare workforce. While regulation and standardisation remain essential for improving education quality, the challenge lies in ensuring that regulatory implementation does not slow the development of trained professionals required to meet the country’s growing healthcare needs.Need for Standardisation in Allied Healthcare Education
Standardisation of allied and healthcare education has become increasingly important due to long-standing variations across institutions in programme names, course duration, admission eligibility, curriculum structure, clinical training, assessment methods and faculty requirements. Such differences can directly influence graduate competency, professional mobility and public confidence in healthcare services.
The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was introduced to establish a national regulatory framework for allied and healthcare professions. The Act provides for institutional assessment, maintenance of professional registers, promotion of access, encouragement of research and adoption of scientific advancements.
Competency-based curricula are designed to align education with defined clinical skills, patient safety requirements and healthcare delivery needs. In April 2025, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, in collaboration with NCAHP, introduced competency-based curricula for ten allied and healthcare professions, describing the move as an important step towards improving uniformity and quality.
The objective of NCAHP remains focused on creating nationally comparable standards. The concern is not the need for standardisation but whether incomplete curriculum coverage could unintentionally affect workforce expansion.Gap Between Recognised Professions and Approved Curricula
NCAHP has released curricula in several areas, including Physiotherapy, Optometry, Nutrition and Dietetics, Dialysis Therapy, Radiotherapy Technology, Medical Radiology and Imaging Technology, Anaesthesia and Operation Theatre Technology, Health Information Management, Physician Associates, Medical Laboratory Sciences, Occupational Therapy, Respiratory Technology, Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine Technology.
These curriculum releases represent an important step, but they do not yet cover the complete range of professions recognised under the NCAHP framework. The 8 April communication states that the released curricula cover around 28 professions, leaving several recognised areas outside the current approved curriculum structure.
This situation has created a regulatory gap where professional recognition exists, but educational expansion remains restricted until approved curricula become available. In practical terms, institutions may have the authority to consider developing programmes in recognised fields but may not be able to begin admissions or launch courses without the required curriculum framework.Impact on Educational Institutions
Universities and healthcare institutions across India are planning major investments in allied healthcare education. These investments include simulation laboratories, skill development facilities, diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, hospital partnerships, faculty recruitment, digital learning platforms and quality assurance systems.
However, uncertainty regarding curriculum availability may discourage institutions from committing resources to new programmes. This concern is particularly relevant for private universities, healthcare groups and regional institutions that are prepared to create training capacity but require clear regulatory timelines.
Launching a healthcare programme requires extensive academic planning, including approval through Boards of Studies, Academic Councils, statutory authorities, clinical training agreements and admission processes. Delayed curriculum availability may therefore affect programme development, reduce student opportunities and limit institutional response to healthcare sector requirements.Impact on India’s Allied Healthcare Workforce Expansion Plans
The NCAHP direction must be considered alongside India’s broader strategy to strengthen its allied healthcare workforce. In the Union Budget 2026, the Government announced plans to upgrade existing allied health institutions, establish new institutions in both public and private sectors and train one lakh allied health professionals over five years in selected disciplines, including Optometry, Radiology, Anaesthesia, Operation Theatre Technology and Applied Psychology.
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s post-budget consultation on “Scale-up Allied Health Professionals” also focused on adding one lakh Allied Health Professionals over five years. The consultation linked this requirement to demographic changes, non-communicable diseases, healthcare infrastructure expansion and increasing dependence on advanced medical technologies.
India already has a significant educational base in allied healthcare. The Ministry noted that the country has more than 500 government institutes offering around 48,000 seats and approximately 3,800 private institutes providing more than 3.6 lakh seats. At the same time, the Ministry highlighted differences in infrastructure, laboratories, equipment and availability of trained faculty.
These figures underline the need for simultaneous expansion and quality improvement. Restricting programme development only to disciplines with released curricula could result in uneven workforce growth, with some professions expanding rapidly while other recognised fields remain underdeveloped.
In the short term, institutions may postpone investments and admissions. In the medium term, hospitals could continue facing shortages of specialised technical professionals. In the long term, India may experience challenges in developing a balanced workforce across healthcare disciplines, geographical regions and levels of care.
Modern healthcare systems depend heavily on allied professionals in diagnostics, imaging, emergency care, operation theatres, dialysis, rehabilitation, radiotherapy, critical care and chronic disease management. Limited formal education capacity across required professions could increase dependence on informal training systems and restricted talent pools.
The larger concern is therefore not only delayed academic approval but also a possible gap between regulatory implementation and national healthcare workforce planning.Need for a Balanced Regulatory Approach
India’s healthcare education system requires a balanced approach where quality standards and workforce expansion progress together. A structured transition mechanism can help maintain NCAHP’s regulatory authority while enabling responsible growth of allied healthcare education.
NCAHP could establish a time-bound curriculum release schedule for all remaining recognised professions. Such a roadmap would allow universities, hospitals and state authorities to plan infrastructure, faculty recruitment and admissions more effectively.
Institutions meeting defined requirements related to infrastructure, faculty strength, laboratories, clinical exposure and governance could be considered for provisional programme approval in professions where curricula are still pending.
Any programme approved under a transitional arrangement should be required to adopt the NCAHP curriculum once it is released. This approach would preserve national consistency while preventing unnecessary delays.
During the interim period, institutions could follow benchmark curricula developed by established universities, national skill frameworks or internationally accepted competency models, subject to regulatory review.
Regulatory assessment should focus not only on documentation and infrastructure but also on student competencies, clinical training quality, assessment standards, internship systems and graduate preparedness.
Curriculum development should also involve universities, hospitals, professional associations, state councils and industry stakeholders to ensure that academic standards remain aligned with healthcare delivery requirements.Conclusion
The NCAHP’s 8 April 2026 direction represents a major move towards standardising allied and healthcare education in India. The emphasis on approved curricula, common educational standards and institutional accountability is essential for maintaining quality assurance and patient safety.
However, delayed curriculum availability for recognised professions could unintentionally slow programme development, institutional investment and student access to specialised education. It may also create uneven growth across different areas of the allied healthcare sector.
As India works towards training one lakh allied health professionals over five years, regulatory systems must support both quality and capacity building. A carefully designed transitional framework can enable NCAHP to function not only as a regulator but also as a key facilitator in developing a future-ready allied healthcare workforce for the country.
About The Author
Comment List