The circumstances of the departure suggest a premeditated exit. According to statements provided by Rahul, Devi did not leave empty-handed; she allegedly decamped with approximately ₹2 lakh in liquid cash and a significant cache of jewelry. This second high-profile disappearance has left her previous partner in a state of financial and personal ruin, prompting him to seek legal recourse in two different states. The incident has transitioned from a domestic drama into a complex jurisdictional standoff, highlighting the procedural difficulties inherent in tracking individuals across state lines in India.
The legal pursuit of the matter remains in a state of frustrating limbo. While Rahul has approached authorities in both Sitamarhi and Aligarh, his efforts to initiate a formal criminal investigation have been met with bureaucratic resistance. Law enforcement officials in Aligarh have maintained that because the alleged theft and disappearance occurred in Bihar, the responsibility for filing a First Information Report (FIR) lies with the Sitamarhi police. Conversely, the transition of the case across state borders has resulted in a lack of immediate action, leaving no official case registered as of this week.
This case serves as a stark illustration of the social and legal complexities that arise when personal vendettas and familial betrayals intersect with rigid jurisdictional boundaries. Beyond the sensationalist nature of the elopements, the incident underscores the vulnerability of individuals when crimes occur far from their primary residence, often resulting in a vacuum of accountability. As the search for Sapna Devi and her latest companion continues, the story remains a cautionary tale of fractured family dynamics and the sluggish gears of interstate police cooperation.
About The Author
Comment List