In a post on X on Thursday, JD Vance shared a photograph of the purchase receipt and wrote, "She bought a $50 dress for $8.75. America: meet your next director of the federal budget!" His comment came after Usha Vance responded to media attention surrounding the political symbolism attributed to her maternity wardrobe.
The discussion began after The New York Times published an opinion column titled The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image, written by fashion critic Vanessa Friedman. The article examined the public presentation of prominent women in the Trump administration who are expecting children, including Usha Vance, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, and Katie Miller, the wife of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, both of whom recently gave birth.
Responding to the column on X, Usha Vance dismissed the analysis with humour. She wrote, "Now that we know the political significance of my .75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, can't wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic-waistband pants and compression socks! In the meantime, enjoy my pregnancy fashion (or lack thereof) and a good story with your kids on Storytime with the Second Lady."
She accompanied the post with a photograph of the receipt and added, "And here's the receipt!"
According to the opinion piece, Vanessa Friedman referred to an Instagram Father's Day reel posted by Usha Vance, noting that she was "wearing a stretchy coral dress that hugs her stomach." Friedman wrote that the simultaneous pregnancies of three prominent women in the Make America Great Again movement were "indubitably, a coincidence," but argued that the development had become significant for an administration she described as having a strong understanding of political aesthetics and visual messaging.
Friedman further stated, "That three such prominent women in the MAGA movement were pregnant at pretty much the same time was, indubitably, a coincidence. But for an administration that has such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that an unspoken dress code in which men outfit themselves in the image of the president has developed, it has also become a telling one."
She added, "Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House's family and fertility platform."
The column also argued that after publicly announcing their pregnancies, the women intentionally showcased their growing baby bumps. Discussing Usha Vance specifically, Friedman wrote, "As second lady, her job is also to represent and humanise the vice president. By spotlighting her pregnancy, she is doing exactly that."
Usha Vance, who is expecting the couple's fourth child while JD Vance serves as Vice President in the Trump administration, responded by focusing attention on the discounted price of her maternity dress rather than the political interpretations attached to her appearance. Her remarks, coupled with JD Vance's humorous response, shifted the public conversation from political symbolism to a discussion about affordability, media scrutiny, and the attention given to the personal style choices of public figures.
About The Author
Comment List