.jpg)
During the parliamentary debate, Minister Bimal Rathnayake openly admitted that political decisions, discriminatory state policies and historical political narratives played a direct role in the suffering endured by the Indian Origin Tamil community after Sri Lanka gained independence.
The statement drew strong reactions from political representatives of the community, with Democratic People’s Front Vice President and Tamil Progressive Alliance politburo member Barath Arullsamy describing the Minister’s speech as one of the most candid acknowledgments ever made in Parliament by a Sinhala mainstream political leader regarding the treatment of Indian Origin Tamils.
Arullsamy stated that for decades the community had carried a painful historical burden that many political leaders had refused to publicly recognize. He pointed out that before 1948, all communities in Ceylon were recognized as British subjects. However, after independence, the very people who helped build the country’s plantation economy and national infrastructure became stateless in the land they had helped develop.
He emphasized that members of the community cleared forests, built roads, railways and plantations, and made major contributions to the national economy, yet their struggle for citizenship continued until 2003.
Arullsamy further highlighted that Minister Rathnayake had made a significant observation during the debate by comparing the condition of Tamil communities taken by the British to countries such as Malaysia, Mauritius and Fiji. According to the Minister, those communities progressed socially and economically, while the Tamils brought to Sri Lanka suffered generations of statelessness, disenfranchisement, exclusion and political suppression.
According to Arullsamy, the Minister also acknowledged that several prominent Tamil political leaders and sections of the United National Party leadership supported the post-independence citizenship framework that rendered the Indian Origin Tamil community voteless and stateless.
However, Arullsamy said the Minister stopped short of addressing another painful aspect of the community’s history — the long-standing political vilification of Malayaga Tamils under accusations of so-called “Indian expansionism.”
He stated that for decades poor plantation workers carrying nothing more than tea baskets were politically portrayed as part of an alleged Indian expansion project. He further claimed that extremist political propaganda during earlier political periods, particularly narratives amplified by the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, contributed to suspicion and hostility toward the Indian Origin Tamil community.
Arullsamy said that while the community struggled for citizenship, land rights, education and survival, it was simultaneously treated as a demographic threat, describing the contradiction as one of the major political ironies of post-independence Sri Lanka.
Despite these criticisms, Arullsamy praised Minister Rathnayake and the present government for allowing such difficult discussions to take place openly in Parliament. He said many political leaders in the past lacked the courage to publicly address these realities and added that acknowledgment was the first step toward reconciliation.
Meanwhile, Tamil Progressive Alliance leader Mano Ganesan, both in Parliament and through a video message shared on social media, stressed that the history of the Malayaha Tamil people must never again be erased or politically manipulated.
Arullsamy stated that acknowledgment alone would not be sufficient and said the next phase must focus on practical reforms, including land rights, housing security, economic independence, educational transformation, equal state investment and greater political representation for the Indian Origin Malayaga Tamil community.
He concluded by warning that history must never again be allowed to divide communities, while insisting that the historical experiences of the Malayaga Tamil people should never be forgotten.
About The Author
Comment List