In Assam, the BJP secured a third consecutive electoral victory, underlining its entrenched position in the state. A striking indicator of the Congress party’s weakening base is reflected in the composition of its elected representatives, where it has more Muslim legislators than Hindu ones, despite Muslims constituting only about one-third of the population. This imbalance highlights deeper electoral and demographic challenges faced by the party.
West Bengal witnessed a historic shift as the BJP succeeded in unseating the Trinamool Congress (TMC). With a vote share of approximately 45 percent, the BJP appears to have consolidated nearly two-thirds of the Hindu electorate, assuming minimal cross-community voting. This level of consolidation surpasses even its performance in Gujarat, traditionally considered its strongest stronghold.
In Kerala, the Congress managed to reclaim power from the Communist Party of India (Marxist), restoring the long-standing pattern of alternating governments. However, the most notable development was the BJP achieving close to 15 percent of the total vote share for the first time. Exit poll estimates suggest that the party secured nearly one-fourth of the Hindu vote, including significant support from Ezhava and Nair communities, historically aligned with left and centrist formations. This shift marks a significant transformation in the state’s political behaviour.
Tamil Nadu presented a different narrative with the emergence of actor Vijay’s political outfit, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). His rise has disrupted the entrenched dominance of the Dravidian parties, as the combined vote share of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), excluding allies, fell below 50 percent for the first time. Vijay’s ascent, driven more by rhetorical appeal than ideological clarity, capitalised on public dissatisfaction with governance, corruption allegations against the DMK, and the perceived decline of the AIADMK following the death of its leader Jayalalithaa.
A common thread across these states is the intensification of communal polarisation. In both Assam and West Bengal, the BJP has expanded its voter base by consolidating a substantial portion of the Hindu electorate, aided by narratives rooted in linguistic and cultural nationalism. In Kerala, similar patterns are emerging, albeit at a slower pace. These states also have among the highest Muslim populations in India, and the BJP’s increasing popularity in these regions since 2014 has been accompanied by rhetoric targeting Muslim communities, including references to illegal immigration and political alliances.
Simultaneously, the elections underscore a deepening ideological crisis within opposition parties. Once considered ideologically robust, parties such as the CPI(M) in Kerala and the DMK in Tamil Nadu have faced setbacks, attributed to perceptions of corruption and leadership-centric politics. Their decline raises questions about their ability to sustain relevance and adapt their ideological frameworks to contemporary political realities. The broader non-right political spectrum, including the Congress and regional caste-based parties, appears fragmented and directionless.
Concerns regarding institutional integrity have also surfaced. Allegations of disproportionate removal of Muslim voters from electoral rolls in West Bengal and the use of investigative agencies to influence opposition campaigns have intensified scrutiny of the electoral process. However, the primary political consequence of such developments has been the consolidation of Muslim voters behind opposition parties, inadvertently reinforcing counter-polarisation among non-Muslim voters.
The BJP’s electoral success is also attributed to its strategic shift in economic policy implementation. Beyond its core ideological positioning, the party has increasingly embraced direct benefit transfers and welfare schemes to strengthen its voter base. This approach aligns it with other political parties, as economic policies across the spectrum show limited divergence, focusing on redistribution and welfare rather than structural transformation.
The evolving political economy suggests that opposition strategies based on identity politics or regional narratives have struggled to match the BJP’s combination of ideological mobilisation and welfare-driven governance. Historical precedents, such as the support base of the Left in West Bengal, indicate that economic empowerment and class-based mobilisation once played a crucial role in shaping voter behaviour. The erosion of such frameworks has contributed to the current political realignment.
These election outcomes highlight a critical juncture in Indian politics. The interplay of communal narratives, institutional challenges, and ideological shifts points to a redefined electoral landscape. The ability of opposition forces to reconstruct a coherent political and economic vision will determine the future balance of power, while the BJP’s continued dominance underscores the effectiveness of its integrated strategy combining identity politics with welfare measures.
About The Author
Comment List