Kejriwal had arrived in Rajkot with the intention of speaking to farmers who were arrested during recent demonstrations. However, according to his account, prison authorities denied him entry despite what he described as a legitimate and peaceful request. Visibly agitated, he questioned the administration’s decision, asking whether he was being treated “as though he were a terrorist” for attempting to meet the detainees.
Addressing reporters outside the facility, Kejriwal accused the government of deliberately suppressing dissent and silencing those raising concerns about agricultural issues. He claimed the refusal to grant him access reflected a broader attempt to stifle the farmers’ voice and prevent public scrutiny of their treatment. He further asserted that the episode posed a serious challenge to democratic norms.
The Gujarat administration has not yet issued an official statement explaining why Kejriwal’s request was declined or under what rules the entry was restricted. The confrontation, however, has intensified the political debate around the farmers’ arrests and the state’s handling of protests.
As tensions continue to rise, the incident is likely to fuel ongoing discussions about civil liberties, state accountability, and the rights of political leaders to engage with citizens in custody. Kejriwal’s remarks ensure that the dispute will remain a point of national attention in the days ahead.
About The Author
.jpeg)
Comment List