Muzaffarnagar Mosque Loudspeaker Dispute Escalates, Cleric Arrested as Inaction Against Officer Sparks Public Anger
A dispute over a mosque loudspeaker in Muzaffarnagar escalated into a confrontation between police and cleric Maulana Irfan, captured on CCTV. While the cleric was arrested for an alleged threat and later granted bail, no action against the involved sub-inspector has sparked public anger.
The incident unfolded when police personnel arrived at a mosque in Muzaffarnagar following complaints about the loud volume of its loudspeaker. During the visit, an argument broke out between the mosque’s cleric, identified as Maulana Irfan, and Sub-Inspector Vinod Chaudhary. What began as a verbal exchange quickly escalated, with CCTV footage later capturing moments of the confrontation inside the mosque premises.
According to visuals from the CCTV recording, Sub-Inspector Chaudhary is seen pushing Maulana Irfan during the altercation. The footage has since circulated locally, intensifying scrutiny of the police response. In the aftermath of the dispute, Maulana Irfan allegedly made a statement threatening to “cut the neck,” which prompted immediate police action.
Police subsequently arrested the cleric on the basis of the alleged remark. He was produced before a court and was granted bail shortly thereafter. However, the case took a contentious turn as no disciplinary or legal action was initiated against Sub-Inspector Chaudhary, despite the physical conduct captured on camera.
The perceived disparity in action has triggered strong resentment among sections of the local community, with residents questioning the fairness of the police response and demanding accountability for the officer involved. The incident has reignited broader concerns over police conduct, proportional use of authority, and consistency in enforcing the law during sensitive community disputes.
As the situation continues to draw attention, the episode underscores the fragile balance between law enforcement and religious institutions, highlighting how swiftly routine administrative interventions can escalate into larger controversies with social and legal ramifications.

Comment List