Ranveer Singh Visits Chamundeshwari Temple Following Karnataka High Court Directive in Kantara Controversy
Ranveer Singh visited Chamundeshwari Temple after complying with a Karnataka High Court directive linked to the Kantara controversy. The actor’s remarks during the International Film Festival of India had triggered legal action and public outrage over religious sentiments before the court quashed the case following his apology.
The visit was carried out as part of conditions imposed by the court following an incident in November during the International Film Festival of India, where Singh’s mimicry of a sacred scene from the film Kantara sparked strong reactions from sections of the public. The controversy erupted after the actor allegedly referred to a revered Daiva as a “female ghost,” a remark that hurt religious sentiments and resulted in the registration of a First Information Report against him.
Th
Bollywood actor #RanveerSingh offered prayers at the Chamundeshwari Temple in Mysuru recently. The visit follows the legal controversy connected to his alleged mimicry remarks during #Kantara discussions. pic.twitter.com/YN3yAZCMCT
Read More Supreme Court Questions Continued OBC Reservation for Children of Economically Advanced Families— Milagro Movies (@MilagroMovies) May 26, 2026
e Karnataka High Court quashed the case in late April after taking note of Singh’s apology. However, the court directed the actor to visit the Chamundeshwari Temple within four weeks as an act of atonement linked to the controversy.
Singh’s temple visit drew significant attention on social media, where supporters praised his restrained appearance, devotion, and compliance with the court’s order. Several admirers described the move as a gesture of humility and respect toward religious traditions. One reaction widely shared online stated that although delayed, the actor ultimately fulfilled his responsibility appropriately.
The development comes at a crucial phase in Singh’s professional journey, with discussions surrounding his recent films and career challenges continuing in the entertainment industry. His compliance with the court’s directive has been viewed by many as an attempt to close a sensitive chapter that had generated legal scrutiny and religious backlash.
The incident remains significant as it highlights the growing legal and public sensitivity surrounding depictions of religious traditions in popular culture, while also underscoring the role of judicial intervention in resolving controversies involving public figures and religious sentiments.

Comment List