The absence of those critical references raised larger questions about the relevance of the Quad at a time of geopolitical upheaval, growing uncertainty and increasingly transactional partnerships, where even close allies are openly pressured and bullied.
The meeting involving the foreign ministers of Australia, India, Japan and the United States produced several announcements aimed at reinforcing cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. The four nations unveiled plans to jointly build a port in Fiji and signed agreements on critical minerals and energy security.
The ministers reaffirmed their commitment to safe and unimpeded maritime traffic in the Indo-Pacific, particularly for the flow of energy supplies, fertilizers, semiconductors and critical minerals. They also repeated their support for freedom of navigation in what they described as a “free and open Indo-Pacific.”
Despite those announcements, questions remain over whether such statements are enough to inject fresh momentum into a grouping that lost steam last year after failing to hold a leaders' summit.
A major reason for that slowdown was the tension between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi over Washington's punitive tariffs and Trump's repeated claims that he brokered the India-Pakistan ceasefire after the two nuclear-armed neighbours came dangerously close to war in May last year.
During his four-day visit to India, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio engaged in visible diplomatic repair work, repeatedly stressing the utmost importance of the US-India strategic partnership. However, Indian diplomatic sources continue to maintain that trust has been damaged, and that one visit alone is unlikely to reverse months of perceived sidelining and pressure from Washington.
The meeting also produced announcements on expanded maritime surveillance cooperation in the Indo-Pacific and a broader rollout of the Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness Initiative, which aims to provide near real-time commercial maritime tracking data to regional partners. The developments underscored that all four Quad countries continue to share concerns over China's growing power.
Yet, despite the diplomatic messaging and strategic announcements, the Delhi meeting stopped short of delivering a decisive demonstration of why the Quad still matters in an increasingly unstable global order. The absence of direct references to China, Iran and the uncertainty surrounding a possible leaders’ summit left lingering doubts over the grouping’s direction, cohesion and long-term strategic momentum.
About The Author
.jpg)
Comment List