Political Storm Erupts in Punjab Over Bhagwant Mann’s Remarks on Action Against Stray Dogs

In a social media post, Mann declared that the state government would begin action “to eliminate stray and dangerous dogs” that pose a threat to children and pedestrians. He also thanked the Supreme Court for what he described as a decision supporting such action. The announcement quickly escalated into a political confrontation, with critics arguing that the statement created a misleading impression about the scope of the court’s order

.

Bharatiya Janata Party leader Tejinder Pal Singh Bagga stated that he had formally written to the Chief Justice of India, alleging that Mann had publicly mischaracterised the Supreme Court’s ruling. Bagga asserted that the court permits action only in legally defined situations involving rabid, incurably ill, or demonstrably dangerous dogs after proper veterinary assessment and in strict compliance with the law. He emphasised that the order does not authorise any blanket mass elimination campaign against stray dogs.

ਮਾਣਯੋਗ ਸੁਪਰੀਮ ਕੋਰਟ ਦੇ ਫ਼ੈਸਲੇ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਕੱਲ ਤੋਂ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਕਰੇਗੀ ਬੱਚਿਆਂ ਅਤੇ ਰਾਹਗੀਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਜਾਨ ਨੂੰ ਖ਼ਤਰਾ ਬਣੇ ਅਵਾਰਾ ਅਤੇ ਜਾਨਲੇਵਾ ਕੁੱਤਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਖਤਮ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਵੱਡੀ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ..ਧੰਨਵਾਦ ਸੁਪਰੀਮ ਕੋਰਟ…

— Bhagwant Mann (@BhagwantMann) May 21, 2026

I have formally written to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India regarding Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann public mischaracterisation of the Supreme Court’s order on stray dogs.

The SC order permits action only in specific legally defined cases involving rabid, incurably ill, or… pic.twitter.com/Mgu00Vi8CX

— Tajinder Bagga (@TajinderBagga) May 21, 2026

Punjab Governor Gulab Chand Kataria also called for restraint and adherence to legal procedures. He stated that any action undertaken by the state administration must strictly follow the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court. Stressing the importance of humane treatment, Kataria remarked that dogs are also living beings and warned that the proposed campaign cannot become an indiscriminate killing operation.

Former legislator and medical practitioner Navjot Kaur Sidhu strongly criticised Mann’s remarks, describing them as harsh and insensitive. She urged the Punjab government to focus on humane and sustainable solutions, including sterilisation drives, vaccination programmes, construction of shelters, and mandatory pet registration systems. Sidhu further accused successive governments of neglecting animal welfare infrastructure and argued that the administration must maintain a balance between public safety, compassion, and legal responsibility toward animals.

CM, BHAGWANT MANN; Please read the Supreme Court ruling again and if you don’t understand the law ask someone to explain. Only dogs suspicious of Rabies like symptoms or biting aggressive dogs should be isolated, diagnosed and treated. Harsh orders of killing dogs given by you… pic.twitter.com/UkKt0QYdNB

— Dr Navjot Sidhu (@NavjotSidh42212) May 21, 2026

The controversy has intensified the debate surrounding public safety, animal rights, and the interpretation of judicial directives in Punjab. As political leaders, constitutional authorities, and animal welfare advocates continue to clash over the issue, the matter has emerged as a significant legal and humanitarian discussion with wider implications for state policy and animal protection laws.