Ashok Vajpeyi Recalls Nehru’s Quiet but Pivotal Intervention in the Boris Pasternak Affair
Indian author Ashok Vajpeyi revisits the 1950s Boris Pasternak controversy, highlighting Jawaharlal Nehru’s behind-the-scenes intervention that helped stop the Soviet Union from exiling the Nobel-winning writer. The article details Nehru’s diplomatic role, the global response, and the broader significance for artistic freedom.
Pasternak’s selection for the Nobel Prize provoked intense anger within the Soviet establishment, which viewed his novel Doctor Zhivago as ideologically subversive. In retaliation, Soviet authorities barred him from traveling to Stockholm to receive the honour and began preparing punitive action, including potential expulsion from the country. As global concern mounted, a support committee formed in London to advocate for Pasternak’s safety and freedom.
Recognizing Nehru’s personal rapport with Soviet leaders and his standing as a respected international statesman, the committee urged him to chair their initiative and intervene directly with Moscow. According to Vajpeyi, Nehru accepted the request and quietly reached out through diplomatic channels at a moment when Pasternak’s fate appeared precarious.
Vajpeyi noted that the pressure following Nehru’s involvement prompted Soviet authorities to halt their plans to exile the writer. While Pasternak was still denied permission to travel abroad to receive his Nobel Prize, the anticipated punitive measures were abandoned, offering him a measure of protection at a time of intense state scrutiny.
Reflecting on the episode, Vajpeyi remarked that Nehru’s actions exemplified a leadership style rooted in principled engagement rather than grandstanding. “He worked without proclaiming himself a ‘Vishwaguru,’” he said, emphasizing that Nehru’s role was marked by quiet resolve and a commitment to intellectual freedom.
The recollection adds renewed perspective to a historic moment when diplomatic intervention helped shield a global literary figure from severe state reprisal, underscoring the enduring importance of political support for creative and human rights.

Comment List