Nehru stated that while India had achieved independence, the Muslim League had “departed and gone to Pakistan,” leaving behind what he described as a residual presence in Malabar. He referred to its lone Member of Parliament, B. Pocker Sahib, as isolated in Parliament. He criticised the Praja Socialist Party’s electoral association with the League as ideologically contradictory, and described the organisation itself as “ploughing the sand.” He later extended his critique, calling the Muslim League a “dead horse,” a phrase widely reported in political accounts of the period.
In response, emerging League leader C. H. Mohammed Koya described the organisation as a “sleeping lion,” asserting that its influence would re-emerge. Decades later, in a striking political reversal, the Indian Union Muslim League won 22 of 27 contested seats in Kerala under the United Democratic Front alliance.
Partition Origins and the Birth of a New Political Identity
The Indian Union Muslim League traces its formal origin to March 10, 1948, at Rajaji Hall in Chennai. Following the final session of the All India Muslim League in Karachi in December 1947, Mohammad Ismail assumed leadership of the Indian faction. According to memoir accounts by Mohamed Raza Khan and later analysis by constitutional historian A. G. Noorani, the session prioritised the interests of Pakistan, leaving Indian Muslims politically directionless.
Ismail reportedly declined a financial share of 1.7 million rupees from the Karachi-based organisation’s funds, signalling a decisive break from Pakistan-linked political structures. On March 10, 1948, the organisation was renamed the Indian Union Muslim League. It rejected the two-nation theory and formally adopted a constitution in 1951 affirming its commitment to Indian nationhood, despite retaining a politically sensitive name.
Parallel Institutional Growth: The Rise of Samastha
While the League reorganised itself politically, the Samastha Kerala Jamiyyathul Ulama, founded on June 26, 1926, in Kozhikode Town Hall under Pangil Ahmad Kutty Musliyar with Varakkal Mullakoya Thangal’s support, was building a parallel religious infrastructure in Malabar.
Established as a response to reformist Islamic movements led by Vakkom Moulavi’s Kerala Muslim Aikya Sangam, Samastha positioned itself as a defender of traditional Shafi’i jurisprudence. Between 1927 and 1944, it held 15 annual conferences. Its first publication, Al-Bayan, was launched in 1929 in Arabi-Malayalam script, and the organisation was formally registered in 1934.
In 1945, systematic institutional documentation began. A decisive expansion occurred in 1951 with the creation of the Samastha Kerala Islamic Education Board, aiming to establish a madrasa in every mosque-based community unit. From an initial recognition of seven madrasas, the network expanded to over 11,000 institutions, becoming a critical socio-religious foundation in Malabar.
Political Isolation and Early Electoral Struggles
Ahead of the 1952 elections, the Indian National Congress declined electoral cooperation with the League, citing ideological incompatibility and political sensitivity linked to partition. Nehru had earlier advised Governor-General Lord Mountbatten to persuade Muhammad Ismail to abandon the party framework, arguing that Indian Muslims did not require a religion-based political organisation.
In the 1952 elections, B. Pocker Sahib became the first Indian Union Muslim League Member of Parliament from Malappuram, functioning in political isolation.
During this period, K. M. Seethi Sahib emerged as a key organisational figure, later described by historian Robin Jeffrey as a leading intellectual of the Mappila community. He became Speaker of the Kerala Legislative Assembly in 1960 under the Pattom Thanu Pillai government and died in office in 1961.
Strategic Realignment and Entry into Power
By 1967, after repeated exclusion from ministerial power despite supporting Congress-led coalitions, the Indian Union Muslim League aligned with a Communist-led coalition government under E. M. S. Namboodiripad. The alliance granted the League two ministerial positions.
C. H. Mohammed Koya was appointed Education Minister. During his tenure, he introduced scholarship programmes for Muslim and Nadar girls and supported the establishment of the University of Calicut. His policies are credited with advancing educational access among marginalised communities in Kerala.
Creation of Malappuram District
On May 5, 1969, a cabinet sub-committee comprising E. M. S. Namboodiripad, K. R. Gouri, and C. H. Mohammed Koya approved the formation of a new administrative district. On June 16, 1969, Malappuram district was officially created, carved out from Kozhikode and Palakkad districts, comprising Ernad, Perinthalmanna, Tirur, and Ponnani taluks.
The decision faced strong opposition from Jana Sangh leaders, including Bhairon Singh Shekhawat and Madanlal Khurana, who staged protests and released a pamphlet titled “Malappuram or Moplastan?” Critics, including K. Kelappan, argued that the district’s demographic composition reflected communal consolidation. The Congress Party did not formally oppose the decision.
Consolidation of Religious and Political Authority
The Panakkad family of Sayyid lineage became central to the League’s religious-political structure. Syed Mohammed Ali Shihab Thangal led the organisation from the 1970s until 2009, simultaneously holding spiritual authority within Kerala’s Sunni Muslim community and political leadership within the League, creating a unified influence network alongside Samastha.
In 1979, C. H. Mohammed Koya briefly served as Chief Minister of Kerala for 50 days, becoming the first and only Muslim to hold the office. He died in 1983.
Internal Divisions and National Political Engagement
In 1989, Samastha split into EK and AP factions, reflecting organisational and political divergence within Kerala’s Sunni leadership.
At the national level, the Indian Union Muslim League supported the Rajiv Gandhi government’s reversal of the Shah Bano judgment in 1986 and opposed the 2017 and 2019 legislation criminalising instant triple talaq. In 2003, a judicial commission investigating the Marad Beach killings alleged involvement of League activists in planning and execution, though the party rejected the findings. In 2017, party statements on LGBTQ individuals drew institutional criticism.
Following the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992, Syed Mohammed Ali Shihab Thangal urged restraint and reliance on judicial resolution, helping prevent large-scale mobilisation in Kerala.
Expansion and Contemporary Political Position
In 2004, E. Ahamad became the first Union Minister from the Indian Union Muslim League, holding the portfolio of Minister of State for External Affairs.
By August 2025, the party established a national headquarters in Delhi and expanded organisational presence across more than eight states.
In the 2026 Kerala Assembly elections, the United Democratic Front secured victory, with the Indian Union Muslim League winning 22 of 27 contested seats. The party also elected its first woman Member of the Legislative Assembly, Advocate Fathima Thahiliya from Perambra.
Today, Sayyid Munavvar Ali Shihab Thangal leads the Kerala unit. Veteran strategist P. K. Kunhalikutty remains a central figure in electoral planning. The party continues to function as a decisive force in coalition formation, with the Congress High Command dependent on UDF coordination in Kerala’s power structure.
The League has also expanded social outreach, including housing assistance following the Wayanad landslide, where 52 homes were constructed, with 14 inaugurated through religious housewarming ceremonies conducted by Hindu priests according to beneficiary traditions.
From its origins in the aftermath of Partition to its position in contemporary coalition politics, the Indian Union Muslim League has evolved into one of Kerala’s most structurally embedded political organisations. Historical assessments of Jawaharlal Nehru’s early characterization now stand in contrast to its sustained electoral and institutional presence across decades of Indian democracy.
About The Author
Comment List