Thailand Rejects Trump’s Ceasefire Claim, Vows to Continue Military Action Against Cambodia

On Saturday, Thai fighter jets carried out strikes on targets near the contested frontier, underscoring Bangkok’s position that no truce is in effect. Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, writing on Facebook, said Thailand would “continue to perform military actions until we feel no more harm and threats to our land and people,” making it clear that the country considers its security concerns unresolved.

Trump had stated on Friday that he spoke separately with Anutin and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and that both leaders had agreed to “cease all shooting.” According to Trump, the talks were meant to reinforce an October ceasefire framework tied to the long-running border dispute between the two nations. However, neither Anutin nor Hun Manet referenced any fresh agreement in their public statements following the calls.

Thailand’s leader went further, explicitly rejecting the idea that a ceasefire had been reached. “I want to make it clear. Our actions this morning already spoke,” Anutin said, pointing to the continued military operations as evidence that Thailand does not recognize any halt in fighting.

The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the renewed clashes or Thailand’s rejection of Trump’s claim, leaving uncertainty over Washington’s role and influence in the unfolding situation.

Cambodia, meanwhile, struck a more conciliatory tone. In a statement posted on Facebook on Saturday, Prime Minister Hun Manet said Phnom Penh remains committed to seeking a peaceful resolution to disputes in line with the October agreement, even as tensions persist on the ground.

The renewed fighting and conflicting narratives highlight the fragility of diplomatic efforts in one of Southeast Asia’s most sensitive border conflicts. With military action continuing despite international mediation claims, the situation raises broader questions about regional stability, the effectiveness of external diplomacy, and the risk of further escalation if a mutually recognized ceasefire cannot be secured.