Luxury Chair Row Engulfs Delhi Chief Minister Amid Escalating Water Crisis
Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta faces political backlash after a photograph showing her seated in a luxury Red Oak “Imperio” chair sparked controversy during Delhi’s ongoing water crisis. Opposition leaders questioned the optics of expensive office furniture as several areas, including Dwarka, continue to face severe daily water shortages.
The photograph, posted on May 25 during a meeting with actor Rakesh Bedi, showed Gupta seated in a Red Oak “Imperio” chair reportedly priced between ₹66,000 and ₹82,600. The chair is equipped with electric reclining features and an in-built massage function, prompting opposition leaders to question the timing and optics of such expenditure while several parts of Delhi continue to struggle with severe water shortages.
The controversy intensified after Aam Aadmi Party legislator Sanjeev Jha publicly criticized the Chief Minister, linking the luxury furniture to the ongoing water scarcity affecting residents across the city. Areas including Dwarka are reportedly facing daily shortfalls of nearly 250 million gallons of water, adding to public frustration during the peak summer season.
Opposition leaders argued that the image reflected administrative insensitivity at a time when citizens in multiple localities are dealing with disrupted water supply and rising hardship. The issue quickly gained political traction online, with critics accusing the government of prioritizing luxury over urgent civic concerns.
Supporters of the Chief Minister, however, defended Gupta and dismissed the criticism as politically motivated. They argued that the cost of the chair was insignificant when compared to what they described as extravagant spending under the previous Aam Aadmi Party administration. In particular, they referred to the ₹33.66 crore renovation of former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s official residence, an issue that had earlier generated widespread political controversy.
Defenders of Gupta also maintained that ergonomic seating arrangements were necessary for senior officials required to work long hours and handle continuous administrative responsibilities. They claimed the outrage surrounding the chair was disproportionate and intended to divert attention toward political confrontation rather than governance issues.
The controversy has now evolved into a broader political battle between the ruling administration and the opposition, with both sides using the issue to target each other over public spending, governance priorities, and accountability during a period of mounting civic pressure in Delhi.

Comment List