Addressing the Aravalli controversy, Hooda urged the central government to formally seek judicial reconsideration of the 100-metre decision, which has been at the heart of environmental and legal disputes surrounding land use in the region. He asserted that the ruling poses serious risks to the protection of the Aravalli ecosystem, one of the oldest mountain ranges in the world and a critical natural barrier against desertification and environmental degradation in northern India.
Hooda emphasised that the responsibility to correct the decision lies with the government itself, not with environmental activists or affected citizens alone. According to him, the Centre should not only file a review petition before the Supreme Court but also publicly acknowledge its mistake by issuing an apology to the people of the country. He argued that such a step would demonstrate accountability and a genuine commitment to environmental conservation.
The former Haryana chief minister framed the issue as one of national importance, linking the protection of the Aravallis to broader concerns such as climate resilience, ecological balance and sustainable development. He stressed that policy decisions impacting sensitive ecological zones must be revisited when they threaten long-term environmental security, particularly in regions already facing acute stress from urban expansion and mining activity.
The Aravalli range has long been a focal point of legal and political scrutiny, with multiple court interventions and policy shifts over the years. Hooda’s demand adds fresh pressure on the Centre at a time when environmental governance and judicial oversight remain under close public watch.
As the debate continues, the call for a Supreme Court review underscores the growing intersection of environmental protection and political accountability, highlighting how decisions taken today could shape the ecological future of the region for decades to come.
About The Author
Comment List