Panja asserted that the central force, entrusted with guarding the Indo-Bangladesh border, has failed in its responsibilities and is “allowing infiltrators in exchange for cash.” She questioned why, despite the BSF being under the direct control of the Union Home Ministry, the Centre repeatedly shifts responsibility onto the West Bengal administration whenever concerns about infiltration arise. Her statement has added a new layer of intensity to the political back-and-forth surrounding law and order in the border districts.
The allegations come at a time when state and central authorities are already locked in disagreements over jurisdictional issues and administrative accountability. Panja’s comments have prompted calls for clarity on the Home Ministry’s stance, with opposition voices suggesting that the Centre must address the charges rather than framing the issue as a failure of the state government. Meanwhile, political analysts note that the remarks could deepen mistrust between the two sides at a moment when border security coordination is essential.
While the BSF has yet to issue a detailed response, officials close to the force have previously denied similar accusations, maintaining that its personnel operate within strict legal and procedural frameworks. However, Panja’s claim has widened the debate over oversight mechanisms and the necessity for transparent communication between state law-enforcement bodies and central security agencies.
As the controversy unfolds, it underscores the growing friction between West Bengal and the Centre over security governance, raising broader questions about accountability, inter-agency coordination, and the politicisation of border-related issues. The coming days may determine whether Panja’s allegations lead to formal inquiries or intensify the entrenched political divide.
About The Author
Comment List