According to local accounts, the protest took place in the Sadar Kotwali area at Shiv Chowk, where participants burned an effigy of the Prime Minister of Bangladesh. The act was intended as a symbolic expression of outrage against what protesters described as sustained violence and targeted attacks on Hindu communities in Bangladesh.
Those participating in the protest accused the Bangladeshi authorities of allowing extremist and jihadist elements to flourish, alleging that such groups were responsible for the violence. Alongside slogans condemning the situation, demonstrators raised demands calling for the expulsion of Bangladeshi nationals from India, linking their demand to broader concerns over security and religious safety.
Local police were deployed at the site and worked to ensure that the demonstration remained under control. Officials focused on maintaining law and order and preventing any escalation, and the protest concluded without reports of major disturbances. Police sources indicated that the gathering was monitored closely to ensure it remained peaceful.
Protesters stated that the demonstration was organized specifically to draw attention to what they described as religious violence and oppression faced by Hindus in Bangladesh. They emphasized that the effigy burning was meant to convey strong dissent rather than provoke unrest.
The incident highlights how developments beyond India’s borders can resonate deeply at the local level, triggering public demonstrations and political expression. As regional and religious tensions continue to influence public discourse, authorities remain watchful to balance the right to protest with the need to maintain communal harmony and public order.
About The Author
Comment List