The exchange originated on Thursday, the first day of the special session, when Prime Minister Modi took a swipe at DMK parliamentarians for their choice of attire. The Prime Minister thanked the MPs for wearing black, likening the gesture to a 'kala tika'—the traditional black mark applied to ward off evil powers and misfortune. Senior DMK leader Dayanidhi Maran clarified that the attire served as a formal protest against a delimitation exercise that southern states fear will systematically erode their political influence and representation in Parliament.
Speaking from the floor of the House on Friday, Kanimozhi expressed surprise that those claiming to protect Hindutva were offended by the color black, pointing directly to the representation of Kali. She described the deity as the all-powerful dark goddess who signifies feminine power and serves as the force that drives away ego, arrogance, and ignorance. Beyond the religious parallel, Kanimozhi anchored the choice of color in the ideology of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and its intellectual leader, the social activist Periyar. She asserted that black represents the self-respect and the refusal to bow taught by Periyar, vowing that the party would fight until the end.
The administrative crux of the protest involves the redrawing of parliamentary and assembly constituency boundaries based on 2011 census data rather than awaiting the results of the 2026/27 exercise. Southern states, including Tamil Nadu under Chief Minister MK Stalin, have warned that this timeline penalizes regions that successfully implemented population control, while northern, Hindi-speaking states may receive an unfair increase in seats and importance. Although the Prime Minister offered a "guarantee" that no such discrimination would occur, the DMK remained steadfast in its opposition to the bill tabled yesterday.
Kanimozhi concluded her address by demanding that a fresh bill be introduced and placed in the public domain for at least three months of wider consultation. She maintained that for the Constitution to endure as a charter of trust, any amendments must be guided by principle and anchored in fairness, restraint, and fidelity. This clash underscores the deep-seated tensions between the Centre and southern states over the future of India’s federal structure and the equitable distribution of political power.
About The Author
Comment List