Prior to this administrative intervention, the eligibility criteria for NEET-PG 2025 were notably stringent, requiring General and EWS candidates to secure the 50th percentile—roughly 276 out of 800 marks. Similarly, PwBD candidates required the 45th percentile, while SC, ST, and OBC candidates were expected to clear the 40th percentile, equivalent to approximately 235 marks. However, under the revised mandate, the General and EWS cut-off has been lowered to the 7th percentile (103 marks), and the PwBD category to the 5th percentile (90 marks). The most radical shift applies to the SC, ST, and OBC brackets, where the elimination of a minimum percentile barrier allows candidates with negative net scores to participate in the seat allotment process. While NBEMS clarified that the overall merit ranking remains unchanged, the eligibility expansion fundamentally alters the gateway to MD and MS programs.
The rationale behind this drastic measure stems from a mounting crisis of "empty desks" in medical colleges. Despite completing two rounds of counseling, a significant number of seats—particularly in high-pressure branches like Anesthesia and Surgery, or in private institutions with exorbitant fee structures—remained unfilled. Officials point to a paradoxical situation where the nation suffers from a shortage of specialists while the very seats designed to train them sit idle. Experts suggest that high tuition costs, grueling work hours, safety concerns for resident doctors, and the mandatory rural service bonds in several states have increasingly deterred MBBS graduates from pursuing certain postgraduate specializations. By lowering the bar, the government intends to ensure that the massive investment in medical infrastructure does not go to waste and that the pipeline for future physicians remains open.
However, the medical fraternity remains deeply divided over the long-term implications of this "historic" drop. Senior consultants and medical associations have expressed apprehension that allowing candidates with negligible or negative scores into specialized training could compromise the quality of healthcare. Since these candidates will eventually become the nation's surgeons and specialists, critics argue that a minimum academic benchmark is essential for patient safety. Conversely, proponents of the move argue that these candidates are already licensed MBBS doctors who have cleared their foundational medical education, and the move simply ensures that the ranking system, rather than an arbitrary percentile floor, dictates seat distribution. As the third round of counseling commences, the decision stands as a pivotal moment in Indian healthcare policy, highlighting the desperate need to reform not just admission criteria, but the broader economic and safety environment of medical residency in India.
About The Author
Comment List