A fresh political storm has erupted in West Bengal after BJP MP and actor Arun Govil publicly condemned suspended TMC legislator Humayun Kabir for his comments surrounding the foundation of the Babri Masjid. Speaking in Kolkata, Govil expressed strong displeasure over Kabir’s recent remarks on the decades-old issue, asserting that the former minister’s statements were aimed solely at keeping himself in the public eye.

Govil, best known nationally for his portrayal of Lord Ram in the iconic television series Ramayan, did not hold back while addressing the controversy. He criticised Kabir’s comments as inflammatory and went so far as to describe him as “unfit to live in the country,” calling him “anti-national” for his stance. The BJP leader suggested that Kabir’s remarks were not rooted in historical or political substance but were intended to provoke and garner attention.

The sharp attack has triggered swift reactions across the political spectrum, intensifying the ongoing exchanges between the BJP and the Trinamool Congress in the state. Opposition leaders denounced Govil’s language as excessive, while BJP supporters defended his right to express outrage over what they viewed as a sensitive and emotive subject.

Kabir, who had earlier been suspended by the TMC, has remained at the centre of multiple controversies in recent months. The latest confrontation adds another layer to the charged political climate in West Bengal, where issues of religion, identity and historical memory frequently intertwine with electoral narratives.

As debate over Govil’s remarks continues, the episode underscores how deeply polarising historical disputes remain in India’s political landscape. The confrontation is expected to fuel further discourse within state politics, particularly in the lead-up to upcoming electoral cycles.

A political storm has erupted after Trinamool Congress (TMC) legislator Humayun Kabir’s recent remarks triggered sharp criticism from the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha. The organisation on Saturday submitted a formal memorandum to the Prime Minister, urging immediate and stringent action against the MLA for what it described as statements capable of undermining national integrity and disturbing social harmony.

According to the memorandum, the Mahasabha accused Kabir of delivering comments that it believes amount to anti-national intent and pose a threat to India’s cultural fabric. The group alleged that the remarks were serious enough to warrant charges of sedition and insisted that allowing such statements to go unchecked could fuel discord within communities.

The organisation further claimed that Kabir’s comments were likely to heighten societal tension and provoke unrest, arguing that swift intervention from central authorities was necessary to prevent potential escalation. While the document does not detail the administrative response, the Mahasabha maintains that immediate punitive measures would set a precedent against rhetoric that could destabilise public order.

As the controversy continues to unfold, the incident has added a fresh layer of political friction, underscoring the growing sensitivity around public statements made by elected representatives and their potential impact on communal relations.